SAMR success is NOT about Tech

Quick refresh

If you aren’t aware of the S.A.M.R. model (devised by Ruben R. Puentedura – @rubenrp) then in simple form it explains the common journey teachers go through when introducing technology. It’s popular for introducing iPads in schools. More info here.

Quick version:
Substitution: Do old paper task on device
Augmentation: Do old paper task digitally but now using an extra app feature
Modification: Students benefit from the versatility and combine new digital tools for new outcomes
Redefinition: Students are collaborating and learning in ways previously not imagined

Slow Progress

Even in my school, the speed at which the staff as a whole move through the SAMR model from substituting tasks for their digital equivalent to redefining how they help students learn is slow, sometimes seeming to stall completely. My school is good at providing professional development but after 4 years the conversations by tech leaders contain the same frustrations.

i4S SAMR Mindset

New Focus

I was thinking today that I had to make it clear that competency with technology is not the first issue you should worry about if you want to make SAMR progress. The issue to tackle first is the teaching conventions and mindsets amongst the staff, and for this you need some pretty simple and effective arguments.

So here are some I’ve used to move staff on a little:

1. Question the effectiveness of “Teaching/lecturing”

The aim of lecturing is that all leave the room with identical understanding. All teachers, secretly or not, know this has never been true but you are guaranteed to have to repeat information to the “bad listeners” and simultaneously waste the time of the “top” students who already know the material. Students listen at different levels and understand at different levels, something quietly ignored by many teachers.

2. What’s your strategy to ensure your students can cope & learn without a teacher?

Many teachers who moan about students’ inability to “think” are often expecting them to arrive at the same conclusion as themselves and thus attempt to painstakingly guide them to that very same point. This teaches kids to rely on well-rehersed guidance and not seek their own understandings. Employers and universities then complain that too many applicants seem to lack independence and drive to solve their own problems.

3. Can you tell me your course content is more important than other courses?

No matter what exists or is important in 10 years (the world seems to be changing quickly for some), students are guaranteed to need independence, willingness to help, imagination, teamwork, digital skills for staying connected, problem solving strategies and confidence. I believe that any course content is only a tool to achieving these far more overarching skills and mindsets. If students develop these, any content or learning becomes more enjoyable and thus seems more manageable and they will connect with what is appropriate at the time.

4. If you deliver your course, they’ll only ever check the mailbox to learn something.

Be less definite & ambiguous with your questioning. This makes it harder but kids are resilient and allowed freedom in how they tackle problems independently or in teams will develop the skills that so many feel school fails to encourage, and in some cases kills.

Learning the tech side of things comes quickly when teachers can see a reason for doing so. This is achieved when old habits are shown to be less effective in the modern context and that change is a must and not an option. Keep your teaching colleagues questioning their own habits and connecting with each other to collaboratively design active, student-centered learning spaces.

12 comments on “SAMR success is NOT about Tech

  1. Appreciate the post! One thing I noticed was the text on the graphic in the tablet- “How are your students preparing for a life of learning without all-knowing teachers?” Perhaps another question would be “How are your students preparing for a life of learning WITH all-knowing devices?” As has been written by many, knowledge scarcity no longer puts a premium on traditional models of learning/school.

    The 4 points you use to challenge your staff are important, but I did want to push back on “if students develop these [overarching skills], any content or learning comes easily”. I understand the point and also believe that it is more important to learn how to LEARN, collaborate, communicate, etc than to learn about any specific topic….but I don’t think this is an accurate general conclusion to draw. In fact, I’d hope the students understand that future learning will most likely NOT “be easy”.

    Anyways, great work here pushing our thinking about SAMR.

  2. Pingback: SAMR success is NOT about Tech |  IPAD 4 SCHOOLS - smartphone-hattan

  3. Pingback: SAMR success is NOT about Tech | Online Language Learning

  4. Pingback: Resources added to Diigo (weekly) | Beth Holland

  5. Pingback: Weekly Resources for the End of February | Leading Change in Changing Times

  6. Pingback: In Response to “Redefinition” | Beth Holland

  7. I like the ladder instead of the pool because I feel like I have already substituted technology and it is a climb to learn all of the amazing ways I can get students to own their learning with self exploration and research using technology.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s